Examining Clinician Differences that Influence Ratings of the
Probability of Harm and Rehospitalization on a
Standard Dangerousness Assessment
Christina M. Harris
University of Nebraska –
Lincoln
|
|
References
Carroll, A. (2007). Are violence risk assessment tools clinically
useful? Australian and New Zealand
Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 301-307.
Harris, P. B., Boccaccini, M. T, & Murrie, D.C. (2014). Rater differences in psychopathy measure scoring and predictive
validity. Law and Human Behavior, 39
(4), 321-331.
Hugaboom, D. R. (2002). The different duties and responsibilities of
clinical and forensic psychologists in legal proceedings. A Journal of Undergraduate Student Research,
5, 26-32.
Jensen-Doss, A. & Hawley, K. M. (2010). Understanding barriers to evidence-based assessment: Clinician
attitudes toward standardized assessment tools. Journal of Clinical Child Adolescent Psychology, 36 (6), 885-896.
doi:10.1080/15374416.2010.517169
Reid, W.H. (2003). Why nonforensic
clinicians should decline forensic referrals. Journal of Psychiatric Practice: Law and Psychiatry, 9 (2),
163-166.
Scott, C. L & Resnick, P. J. (2006). Violence risk assessment in persons with mental
illness. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 11(6) 598-611. Retrieved November 1, 2016, from
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178906000279.
Slovic, P., Monahan, J.,
& MacGregor (2000). Violence risk
assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing
instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Behavior, 24 (3), 271-296.
Index Introduction Methods Results Discussion Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Figure 1 Figure 2