|
References Arslan, S. & Akin, A. (2014). Metacognition: As a predictor of one’s academic locus of control. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 33-39. Bruning et al (2011). Sensory, short-term, and working memory. Ch. 2 in Bruning, Schraw, & Norby (2013). Cognitive psychology and instruction, (13-36). Boston, MA: Pearson. Bilican, S. & Yildirim, O. (2014). The effects of approaches to learning on student’s reflective and evaluative reading performance in Turkey: The results from PISA 2009. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2437-2442. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. Hoogeveen, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). What works in writing with peer responses? A review of intervention studies with children and adolescents. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 473-502. Jacobs, J. & Paris, S. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3 & 4), 255-278. Kaur, B. & Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Influences of metacognitive and self-regulated learning strategies for reading on mathematical literacy of adolescents in Australia and Singapore. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons (Proceedings of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia). (385-392). Singapore: MERGA. Krebs, S. & Roebers, C. (2012). The impact of retrieval processes, age, general achievement level, and test scoring scheme for children’s metacognitive monitoring and controlling. Metacognition Learning, 7, 75-90. Kramarski, B. 7 Mizrachi, N. (2004). Enhancing mathematical literacy with the use of metacognitive guidance in forum discussion. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 169-176. Miller, G. A. (1994). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 101, 343-352. Mokhtari, K. & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. OECD (2012), PISA 2009 Technical Report, PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en Pilten, P. & Yener, D. (2010). Evaluation of metacognition knowledge of 5th grade primary school students related to non-routine mathematical problems. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1332-1337. Schraw, G. (2000). 7. Assessing metacognition: Implication of the Buros symposium. Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition, 297-321. Schunk, D. (2008). Metacognition, self-regulation, and
self-regulated learning: Research recommendations. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 457-467. Sperling, R., Howard,
B., Miller, L., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and
regulation of cognition. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79.
Sperling, R., Howard,
B., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004).
Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational
Research and Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
Sperling, R., Ramsay,
C., Richmond, A., & Klapp, M. (2012). The
measurement and predictive ability of metacognition in middle school
learners. The Journal of Educational
Research, 105, 1-7. Vo, V., Li, R., Kornell, N., Pouget, A., & Cantlon, J. (2014). Young children bet on their numerical
skills: Metacognition in the numerical domain. Psychological
Science, 1-10. White, B. & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and
metacognition: Making Science Accessible to all students. Cognition
and Instruction, 16(1), 3-118. Zimmerman, B.J. (2014). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48, 135-147. Zion, M., Michalsky, T., & Mevarech, Z. (2005). The effects of metacognitive instruction embedded within an asynchronous learning network on scientific inquiry skills. International Journal of Science Education, 27(8), 957-983. |
|
|